2011 Ferrari 599GTO_Best Automotive Class

2011 Ferrari 599GTOSo you still think the hottest street-legal Ferrari of them all is the Enzo? Listen up; we have an update. There’s a new champ in Maranello—it’s not as outrageous as the Enzo, but more powerful, more sophisticated, more agile, and even faster. Ferrari calls it “the most extreme sports car” it has ever produced. At a company where fabulous is the starting point for pretty much every new project, that’s saying something.

Ferrari’s challenge (besides, you know, actually engineering the car) was in choosing a name for the beast, which is based on the 599GTB Fiorano. There isn’t much to set the new car apart visually from the GTB, just additional aero elements at the front, aggressive rear air diffusers, and other various airflow management touches that add up to double the high-speed downforce of the “regular” 599.

The corporate brain trust looked down the corridor of Ferrari immortals, and they came across the 1962–64 GTO, and resurrecting the name just made sense. (Less influence came from the mid-engined, twin-turbo V-8 GTO of 1984, which was based on the 308.) And the 599GTO was born.

GTO Then and Now

Although much has changed since 1962, there are some fundamental similarities between the legendary original and this revival. Both cars are front-engine, rear-drive designs, and both have excellent weight distribution, with essentially all of the powerplant’s mass riding behind the front axle’s centerline. Both sport a small aero upkick on the rear decklid, dubbed a “nolder.” Both cars are propelled by aluminum V-12 engines, and both generate compelling noises as the revs climb toward redline. But of course there’s a little more muscle behind the crescendos coming from the 599GTO’s quadruple tailpipes.

Fed by six two-throat Weber carburetors—remember carburetors?—the 3.0-liter SOHC V-12 that powered the original GTO was rated for 300 hp at 7400 rpm and 250 lb-ft of torque. Feeding power via a five-speed manual gearbox to a limited-slip live rear axle, it was capable of a 5.8-second run to 60 mph, and a top speed of 144 mph.

This was very hot stuff in the early ’60s, and isn’t exactly slow even today. But it’s tame compared to what happens when you set the new car’s manettino (the steering-wheel-mounted dial that controls a number of vehicle functions such as traction and stability control levels and shift response) to Race (the middle position of five), and summon all the horses lurking under the 599GTO’s hood.

There are 671 horses on hand in this version of the 599’s V-12, up from 612 in the 599GTB, and they come quickly when called. As the engine shrieks its way to its 8400-rpm peak, you’re squashed into the racing-style bucket seat, with each upshift through the six-speed gearbox giving an extra little shove.

Split-Second Defined

To understate things, those upshifts don’t take long. With a manettino setting of Race or higher, the single-clutch automated manual takes just 60 milliseconds to go from one gear to the next, according to Ferrari. That’s about twice as fast as the gearbox response in the GTB Fiorano, and beyond the hand speed of any human operating a traditional manual.

2011 Ferrari 599GTOThe oversized shift paddles, which are fixed to the steering column rather than rotating with the wheel, make actuating cog swaps a pure joy, and you find yourself wishing there were a few more gears. At the top end of sixth, flat out, the GTO will be traveling at just over 208 mph, so maybe there are enough gears after all.

Ferrari forecasts a 0-to-62-mph time of 3.35 seconds, quicker than the Enzo. After considering power, mass, phase of the moon, and position of the planets, our tech guys forecast something a little quicker—3.1 seconds—since the GTB Fiorano we tested in September 2008 made the sprint in 3.3.

Power Mining

The GTO’s power increase over the GTB was achieved largely by improved intake and exhaust flow, the latter carefully tuned to emit sounds that are both louder and distinctly more nourishing to the tifosi spirit. The howl of the GTO at full chat: Fantastico!

Other elements of the GTO V-12 include a new 180-degree (flat) crankshaft design with throws designed to twirl more freely, extensive friction-reducing measures that Ferrari says make it 12 percent more efficient than the GTB’s V-12, and improved digital control of the ignition system, which monitors and adjusts every combustion event. Surprisingly, the profiles of the cam lobes are unchanged.

This may sound like a lot of effort for a car whose production—which is beginning as we speak—will be limited to just 599 copies but much of the work had already been done for the more radical 599XX, a car with no stree-legal pretensions whatsoever. In XX trim, the Ferrari engineers have managed to extract 720 hp from the V-12; elements of that transformation compatible with contemporary emissions regulations were used on the GTO project.

The Benign Rocket

Anyway, fast and powerful are traits you’d expect of a car wearing the storied GTO badge. What you might not expect is just how eagerly—and forgivingly—this latest GTO applies that power and speed to a given stretch of straights and curves. The fundamental mechanical elements of the dynamic upgrade versus the standard 599GTB Fiorano and the more aggressive Handling Gran Turismo Evoluzione (HGTE) version are stiffer spring rates and a heftier rear anti-roll bar. There’s also more grip; Ferrari estimates about 1.25 g, thanks to bigger contact patches from 285/30 front and 315/35 rear Michelin rubber made from a new compound; these Pilot Super Sports are a little stickier than the very sticky Pilot Sport Cups.

The combination of more grip, standard (and huge) carbon-ceramic rotors, and Brembo’s new ceramic pads yields superb braking power, with ABS standing by should the driver overpower the tires. During our visit to Italy’s fast 3.1-mile Mugello racetrack, a couple of test drivers managed to jump on the brake pedal hard enough, and at a high enough speed, to reach the ABS threshold. This author was never in danger of having this occur, though I did feel my eyeballs trying to dislodge themselves during a couple of late-braking episodes.

Manettino Magic

As with the 599GTB, a set of auto-adjusting magnetorheological shock absorbers provide wonderfully precise damping, as well as astonishingly comfortable ride quality on public roads. But the element that gives this supercar an exceptional degree of user-friendliness is how well the GTO takes care of its driver at high speeds via the five settings offered by the manettino (it means “little hand”), that small dial mounted on the lower right corner of the steering-wheel center.

As we said, the dial governs traction control, stability control, and shift responses. Its lowest setting is for inclement conditions. Next is Sport, which raises the stability control threshold considerably. In Race, the threshold goes higher still, and shift time is reduced to that magical 60 milliseconds. The next step cancels traction control, and the final position shuts down all the electronic assistance.

This last step is for those who are, yes, brave and accomplished, but also who hold title to the car. I certainly didn’t qualify on the last part, and so confined myself to moving the manettino to the fourth click on my final set of laps. At that level, the system allows a lot more sliding around before it kicks in, but it ultimately steps in and restores some sense of order.

The GTO is a well-balanced package, almost as willing to change direction as the mid-engined F430 or 430 Scuderia. There’s a hint of very mild understeer, easily corrected with the throttle, and if the steering isn’t quite as tactile as that of some sports cars, it’s as accurate as a surgical tool. What all this adds up to is a sporting machine of a very high order, one that recently wrested Ferrari’s production-car lap record at its 1.9-mile Fiorano test track from the Enzo, turning in a time of 1:24.0 versus 1:25.0.

The basic get-in for a 599GTB Fiorano is almost $317,000. Adding the HGTE package costs just over $30,000. But that would still leave you a little over 100 grand in your pockets against the 599GTO, at an estimated $450,000. Does that seem high? The Enzo was some $200,000 north of that, and the 29 copies of the 599XX went for $1.5 million each.

What the 599 prospective GTO owners can look forward to is supercar performance that matches the software wizardry of a car like the Nissan GT-R, but without imposing robotic and passionless precision. The GTO will take care of its driver to the extent the driver finds comfortable, but its soul is omnipresent.

However, if your name isn’t already on the list of future owners, these concerns don’t concern you: All 599 examples are already spoken for. If this seems like favoritism, consider that no single Ferrari begins its gestation without an owner’s name on the build sheet, and that the company began inviting carefully selected GTO prospects to visit its headquarters in early January. So, yeah, it’s pretty much favoritism.

2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO
2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO
2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO2011 Ferrari 599GTO
2011 Ferrari 599GTO
2011 Ferrari 599GTO





































































































































2011 Ferrari 599GTO

TxtStopper: Probably Illegal

I saw a press release about a device called the TxtStopper, which is a cell phone jammer you wire into your car's 12v power line to jam cell phones when your engine is running.  The idea is to keep your teenager from texting while driving.


This device is probably not legal in the U.S., since it interferes with legal and regulated cell phone signals.

Also, I don't see how they keep it just to your vehicle.  If it is so low powered that it doesn't extend much beyond about a 5 foot radius, it may not be powerful enough to reliably jam your phone.

Also, cell phones in vehicles have legitimate safety uses, such as 911. 

Bad idea.

Boycott BP?

Should you boycott BP?


Yes, maybe, no.

Yes because reduced wholesales of their products will hurt them in their pocket books and teach them a harsh lesson.

Maybe not, because chances are if you have a 401(k) or pension plan, you are infact a shareholder of BP, one of the largest (by capitalization) companies in the world.  You will help to damage your own retirement funds.

No, because you will hurt your local small-business owners who own BP stations, which are almost all franchises.  And BP is one of the largest employers in oil producing regions.  Many more people will lose jobs, than already are.

Myself, I am ambivalent.  I don't actively avoid BP stations these days, but I don't really seek them out either.  Besides, near me, Speedway and Valero brands are usually cheaper!




Want Less Oil Use? Raise Gas Taxes!

The laws of economics are nearly as immutable as the laws of physics.


If you want to reduce consumption of an item, increase its price, or reduce its supply (same effect, different mechanism).

David Frum points this out in a very lucid piece on CNN.com, here.

We want to get the country off oil? Tax it. (Politicians may not wish to say it, but their advisers can at least think it.) Then liberate people to find their own best alternative -- and incentivize industry to develop alternatives that make sense at the new higher price. And be prepared to argue candidly and straightforwardly in the marketplace of ideas why this new tax is right and justified.
If not, then kindly please spare us the grand speeches about how the status quo is the thing you will not accept. It is precisely the thing you are accepting.

However, as Frum correctly points out, a politician who raises gas taxes by $1+ per gallon will soon be an ex-politician.  That's because there is not really a strong consensus on reducing our use of fossil fuels in this country.  As I write here so often, people want cheap gas and high fuel efficiency, but they aren't willing to pay much for it.

One sensible solution to the sting of higher taxes is to do a "feebate" scheme, where the taxes which are collected are distributed back to the taxpayers as tax rebates.  This way, you would nudge the consumer to consume less fuel, but on average wouldn't hurt the economy much.  Congress can even play with the rebate rules, to penalize higher income consumers less than low income consumers, exclude business and agriculture uses, etc.

Instead, we have the perverse system of CAFE, which tells automakers what cars to build and in what mix they can sell them, but is largely invisible to the consumer except on the window stickers at the dealership.  

Well, CAFE isn't free either.  Getting to 36mpg is going to have some nasty side effects on the vehicles available on the marketplace, foremost of which is that cars are going to get more expensive.   So instead of slightly less expensive cars and pricier gas, we are going to have cheaper gas and more expensive cars.  You still pay in the end, though--efficiency costs money.  The advantage of the market approach is that the consumer has choice--if someone wants to drive a thirsty vehicle, and they can afford the gas tax,they can choose to pay.  With CAFE, the very choice of the thirsty vehicle may be taken away, depending on how the fleet average works out.

Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce China Limited Edition at the Beijing Auto Show

Lamborghini MurcielagoIt really doesn’t take more than a new coat of paint, does it? Not when you are Lamborghini and already build a supercar that makes 670 horsepower and weighs 3,450 pounds (well, at least it does before you add all its vital fluids).

So this is the Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce China Limited Edition. That inelegant name describes a flat gray LP670-4 SV with an orange stripe down the center — “symbolizing the strength of an erupting volcano,” says Lambo, if not the widespread flight cancellations.

“Not more than 10″ of the these China Edition LP570-4 SVs will be built, and they will only be sold in China. In addition to an individually numbered plaque, each car will be inscribed with the name of its owner… which could be good or bad for resale depending on how beloved or notorious one happens to be.

Lamborghini Murcielago
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloceLamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloceLamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloceLamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce















































Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce
Lamborghini Murcielago LP670-4 SuperVeloce

2011 nissan GT-R testing in eroupe

2011 nissan GT-R Days after the launch of the updated-for-2010 Nissan GT-R in Australia, new spy photos reveal that development is underway on what could be either the expected 2012 GT-R update, or the more luxuriously-appointed SpecM version of the current model.

Little appears altered under this test car’s basic camo, with the most significant tweaks going to the outboard intakes up front. At the back, light taping over the rear bumper reveals a revised diffuser and some possible luxury-oriented tweaks, perhaps chrome trimming.

Where the limited-edition SpecV focuses on reduced weight and enhanced handling, the SpecM is expected to offer a more upmarket interior with higher quality leather seats and other premium conveniences.

Nissan Senior Vice President Andy Palmer said last October that the GT-R’s handling and performance will remain largely unaltered in its guise as the upcoming SpecM version.

What will change, according to Palmer, is the interior environment.

Offering a more ‘exclusive’ feel, the Spec-M will feature a higher quality sound system, more luxurious (and expensive) dash, door and seat trimming, and a more ‘bespoke’ experience.

Power is unlikely to be altered, staying with the regular GT-R’s 353kW and 590Nm of torque. It’s possible, perhaps likely, that suspension will be adjusted to provide a more compliant ride.However, Nissan is understood to be working on a more powerful 2012 upgrade for the GT-R, so it’s possible the SpecM will be the first model to debut with boosted power figures.

Speaking with TMR this week, Kazutoshi Mizuno, chief engineer of the GT-R, said that future models may even adopt hybrid or electric-drive powertrains.

source: Best Automotive Class


2011 nissan GT-R
2011 nissan GT-R
2011 nissan GT-R
2011 nissan GT-R

Gordon Murray's (Controversial) T.25

There are new photos out of designer Gordon Murray's proposed T.25 city car (see photos here).


It looks like a very tidy design, with a 1+2 seating arrangement where the passengers sit behind the driver, who is front and center.  But the ergonomics look very tricky--to get those 2nd row passengers in their seats, they have to climb over (I assume) a folded forward drivers seat, after negotiation the forward tilting cab.  

Unless the rear of the cab opens as well?  It is hard to tell from the press photos.

Even if the rear cabin opens, I don't think a forward opening door will be well received.  If it is raining, you (and our seat) are getting wet while you work on getting in or out.  If you are in a front end accident, it seems like it would be harder to open the door, if the hinge was crushed.  

The half-windows are also not going to go over well, although perhaps in the U.K fast food drive-through is not as common as in the U.S.  

Mandatory Breathalyzer Interlock?

Did you know that the NHTSA, together with 13 automakers, is working on a device which will test your breath alcohol concentration, to be installed (they hope) in all vehicles?  Did you know that they are spending $2,000,000 per year (some of which is taxpayer money) on this project?  Now Senator Udall from New Mexico is proposing to increase funding to $12,000,000/year.   


To its credit, the DADSS project acknowledges that in order to be accepted by the public, the system they come up with must be practical and non-intrusive.  They are pursuing several methods of doing a passive test, to avoid having to have the driver blow into a tube and wait several minutes before allowing the car to start.

They are looking at both contacting and non-contacting methods.  One method is to have an IR spectrograph system which reads the blood alcohol level by analyzing the reflected light from a persons skin, which would have to be touching a sensor hidden somewhere such as the steering wheel or shift knob.  Another method would be to analyze the vapor in the cabin using several "sniffers".

However, even a passive system has some significant issues that will need to be overcome before the average person will agree to have one in their vehicle.  The chance of a false positive must be vanishingly small.  But at the same time, the system must be difficult to defeat, or it loses its protective effect.
And any system that degrades over time, to the point where it starts calling false positives, would not be acceptable.   

Consider a contacting spectrograph sensor.  What if it is winter, and our driver wants to wear gloves?  Do you make him remove his gloves to start the car?  Would people submit to that? (No).   

Can the system tell the difference between a bag of saline solution and a persons finger?  Could it be fooled with a hot dog? 

Or what if you are using cabin air sensors, and you are sober but your friend in the passenger seat is drunk?  The system must be able to tell the difference reliably to be acceptable.

Would an air analyzer system work with the windows down, or with the ventilation fans blowing?  Any solution which requires people to start with closed windows or without ventilation won't be accepted.

Could a cabin air analyzer be fooled by taping over the sensor inlet ports?

To be effective and safe, the system would have to make an up or down call quickly while the car is parked.  Which means it will almost certainly have to be a default-to-guilty (restrictive) system as opposed to a non-restrictive  default-to-innocent system.   If the system allows you to drive away, but then makes a "intoxicated" call later, and stops your car, it may leave you in an unsafe situation.  

I am skeptical about the idea that every car should have an alcohol detector on board.  I think many lives could be saved if, instead, the system were required as an after-market installation for anyone who is caught DUI.  I am not ready to accept, and I don't think most people would accept a system which presumes that you are drunk unless you can prove otherwise.  

You can read more about the DADSS project at http://www.dadss.org/.

An interesting source of counter-advocacy is here: http://interlockfacts.com/, which is run by the American Beverage Institute.


Camry Most "American" Car?

According to the Detroit News (here), Cars.com finds that the Camry is the "most American car", based on domestic parts content and popularity.


I suppose it is fair, and congratulations to Toyota for supporting the U.S. economy as much as the Camry does.

But...

If you follow the flow of engineering and the flow of money, the picture is a little different.  The Camry has quite a bit of its engineering done in Japan, which means that Japanese engineers are doing the work, not U.S. engineers.  Also, the profits from the sale of the Camry flow back through Japan, though the shareholders of Toyota are global.

Consider instead a car designed in the U.S. and built over the border, such as the Ford Fusion, or the Chrysler 300.  Yes, it is being bolted together by Mexicans (or Canadians, or even Mexican-Canadians), from parts that flow from all over.  However, U.S. engineers and technicians worked on the product, and and the profits flow mostly to U.S. shareholders (and the .gov in the case of Chrysler and GM).

It isn't black and white, and if you buy a Camry, to my thinking it is much better than buying a car designed and built overseas.  But if you want to support American engineering and American shareholders, you can do better than Camry.


2011 Lotus Elise SC and Exige S RGB (Roger Becker) Special Editions

2011 Lotus Elise SC and Exige S RGB (Roger Becker) Special EditionsFormer director of engineering Roger Becker, who retired this January, is Lotus’ inspiration behind the release of its two new special editions of its Elise and Exige models this September.

Sports and Touring packs are fitted on these two models as standard. Buyers can choose from four
available colors: Aspen White, Starlight Black, Solar Yellow & Carbon Grey. Each vehicle will be recognized by a numbered interior plaque. Roger Becker’s signature can be viewed from the side of the vehicles’ body and on the Lotus nose badge. The Elise SC RGB is powered by a supercharged 1.8l engine, which delivers 217 hp and enables the car to accelerate from zero to 60mph in 4.3 seconds.

Powering the Exige S RGB is a supercharged/intercooled engine Exige S RGB of the same displacement, producing 257 hp and pushing the vehicle to run from zero to 60 mph in 4 seconds.

2011 Lotus Elise SC and Exige S RGB (Roger Becker) Special Editions
In a statement, Becker said that he is “honored” for Lotus naming its two special editions after him, “especially as it allows [him] to offer the customer [his] favorite specifications.” He talked about the past 44 years as having been “an incredible journey.”

2011 Lotus Elise SC and Exige S RGB (Roger Becker) Special Editions
He said, “I’m looking forward to watching Lotus progress in the future, I have no doubt that the company will continue to go from strength to strength.” With the release of these two models, Lotus will retire the 1.8l engine supplied by Toyota because of emission regulations limits. What this indicates is that the Elise R, Elise SC, Exige S and Exige Cup 260 will no longer be available in Europe.







The Truth About The Vuvuzela

The vuvuzela was originally invented by the Jews! Made of a rams horn, the shofar was blown during battle, and I am sure during ancient soccer games. Today, it is blown during the high holidays.



Why Not Small Cars?

Mark Tapscott at the Examiner (link) does a good job discussing why it is that small and fuel efficient cars are not taking off in the marketplace yet. He mentions several major reasons, such as safety issues (perceived and real), and cargo capacity.

I can add a few more.

Perceived Value: Americans still associate size/mass with value. Many of them are not yet ready to agree to pay mid-sized car prices for a small car.

Ride and Handling: Americans seem to be divided on how they want their cars to handle. Some of the best selling cars (Toyota Camry, Corolla) are comparatively squishy, while others (Honda Accord, Civic) have sharper handling and firmer rides. While it is not impossible to produce a small car with a softer ride, light weight and short suspension travel limits do make it more difficult. Also, when efficiency is the overriding design factor, one of the easiest places to lose weight is in sound isolation materials. Do the "silent majority" want little cars with go-kart manners (Mini, Smart) or do they want scaled down couches? Currently, most small cars are tuned more towards go-kart.

Styling: Looks still matter. Americans want a sharp looking car, although what "sharp looking" is is not always consistent. Designers have to work hard to avoid designing short little jelly beans with high roofs, which is really the most space efficient design with some aerodynamic efficiency. On a larger car, there is more surface to play with, and more ways to draw the eye. Americans don't really want something that looks like a rollerskate, with a tall roof and little wheels pushed out to the corners.

Comfort: Americans are not getting thinner. I recently witnessed about 500lbs of female Target shopper (a mother and daughter?) flow out of both sides of an old Dodge minivan, you could almost hear the springs sigh in relief as the ride height jumped by 2" in front. Show those women a Fiesta and they will probably laugh at you. They might then go ahead and eat it.

Toy Story 3

I went to see Toy Story 3 today, it is a real work of art, absolutely wonderful. The opening scene features a wild get-away by train robbing Potato Heads in a purple Barbie corvette driven by Martians.

Even if you have not seen the earlier installments, go see this one.

2011 Revenge Verde – Auto Shows

2011 Revenge Verde – Auto Shows
The Ford GT will have its revenge. Well, Revenge will have the Ford GT.

What you’re looking at is a new supercar based on the bones of an old one. Underneath the bright-green paint and carbon-fiber bodywork, the Revenge Verde that debuted at the Detroit auto show is essentially a Ford GT. But in place of the GT’s 500-hp, 5.4-liter supercharged V-8 will beat a choice of three V-8 powertrains: a 605-hp Ford crate engine, a 638-hp GM LS9, or a “hybrid V-8” provided by HP2g. (More on that last one in a minute.) Transmissions will include a standard manual or a six-speed sequential box.

Dodge Announces Dealer-Customized Vipers

This is the final year for the current Dodge Viper, and the car’s swan song includes a rash of special-edition variants. The list already includes the Final Edition, the 1:33 and Voodoo editions, and the track-only ACR-X. Now Dodge has allowed the three Dodge dealerships with the highest Viper sales to develop customized Vipers.

The cars, from left to right in the above image: Woodhouse Dodge from Nebraska designed a Viper convertible with a two-tone yellow-and-gray paint scheme, and a yellow “driver’s stripe” inline with the driver’s seat. Texas-based Tomball Dodge created the Reverse SRT10 ACR, a special edition of a special edition. The original Snakeskin Green ACR was green with black stripes, while the “Reverse” is black with green stripes. The third Viper was designed by Roanoke Dodge of Illinois and is black with central “Plum Crazy” stripes, a color plucked from the Dodge Charger/Challenger palette.

A total of just 50 of the dealer-designed cars will be built, so order now if you want one.

Cheap Gas, Low Demand For Hybrids, B-Cars

According to Ward's Auto, sales of fuel efficient vehicles (cars with 30mpg+) are falling, as customers move back to their mid-size cars and crossovers.  Toyota's Prius is selling well, but the hybrid Camry and Honda Civic Hybrid are declining.  Small gasoline cars such as the Yaris (down 38%), Honda Fit (down 20%), and Smart ForTwo (down 63%) are not doing well.


Unless Obama can find a way to ramp up the price of gasoline soon, the near term sales of the many new B-cars are not going to be pretty, and fleet fuel economy improvements are going to be small.

Let's face it, Americans don't want little cars.  They want cheap gas and large cars.  I can't wait for the public reaction when the 36mpg CAFE regulations force people to look at B-cars, or pay a premium for larger vehicles.  

 

HP2G Vaporware?

I keep tabs on HP2G, Doug Pelmear's startup which is working on a hybrid electric V8 engine design, because he is somewhat local (Toledo OH) and makes some astonishing claims (110 MPGe and 400HP).  As you may have heard already, HP2G was a Progressive Automotive X-prize contender but dropped out in the early stages of the competition.  HP2G also had a deal with Revenge Design to supply the HP2G engine for a hybrid supercar, the Revenge Blade.  Revenge has broken off its relationship with HP2G, and posted this nasty item on its web site:


Revenge Designs Inc is announcing the withdrawal of all support and funding to Hp2g llc, due to numerous requests for third party validations to the claims of their 110mpge Hp2g engine. Revenge Designs was informed the patents were in place late 2009, since then Revenge Designs has requested documentation for the third party testing to no avail. Revenge Designs finds this to be unacceptable. 

A quick search of the U.S. patent database shows that the only patent that Doug Pelmear has to his name at this time is one for an engine block brace--nothing about his magnetic cylinder assist system.  There are no applications by Pelmear in the U.S. patent application database.  A quick search of the EU patent database also shows only the engine block brace patent.  So it appears that HP2G has failed to apply for a patent for its magnetic hybrid engine technology until very recently.  And it is odd that HP2G refuses to allow 3rd party testing of its prototype, an old Mustang.

Does Pelmear have a 110MPGe V8 engine that also makes 400HP, or is he selling snake oil?  I wonder if we will ever be able to find out.

New J.D. Power Initial Quality Rankings

Some interesting results in the new J.D. Power IQS. (Full press release here)


For 2010, "domestic" brands are beating "import brands" as a group, 108 PP100 vs 109 (Problems Per 100).

Toyota has fallen to significantly below average, at 117 PP100. That crashing sound you hear is the sound of Toyota execs jumping out of high-rise windows.

All GM brands are below average, though all but GMC are better than Toyota.

Ford has charged up to just above Honda, well above average, and Lincoln is better than industry average, but oddly Mercury is below average.

Land Rover continues its dominance as the worst in the industry.

Audi (VW) has improved dramatically over the last few years, from 136 PP100 in 2007 to 111 in 2010. VW has also improved, 135 PP100 in 2010 vs 160 in 2007, but relative to average, is still near the bottom.

Volvo improved from below average to above average since 2007.



Panoz Unveils Europe-Only Abruzzi “Spirit of Le Mans” Sports Car

Europe-Only Abruzzi “Spirit of Le Mans” Sports Car

Panoz has taken the wraps off the Abruzzi “Spirit of Le Mans”, the company’s first new road car since 2008. The car has only been certified for sale in Europe, and just 81 copies will be sold.

Though we now have pictures of the entire car, some of its innards remain a mystery. Panoz says the car makes 600 hp and 590 lb-ft of torque, but doesn’t specify what type of engine or transmission are employed. We do know it’s a front-engine, rear-drive setup, with rear-mounted radiators. The radiators’ mounting position contributes to what Panoz calls Trifecta Cooling. As well as the radiator itself, the car incorporates two other cooling strategies: The rear glass directs air down onto the radiators, and the coolant lines that run from the front-mounted engine to the radiators also serves to cool the fluid.

Europe-Only Abruzzi “Spirit of Le Mans” Sports Car

The body is built from a multi-layer composite material through a process called REAMS—Recyclable Energy Absorbing Matrix System. The company says it’s lighter and less expensive than carbon fiber, yet just as strong. The material is said to be dent resistant and shatter proof, and, according to company founder Don Panoz, an eight-millimeter-thick batch can fend off a .22-caliber bullet. There’s an interesting metric.

Special-Edition BMW M3 Teased

Special-Edition BMW M3 Teased

Roundel fans, mark your calendars. This Thursday, BMW will announce a limited-edition M3 for U.S. buyers. To whet our M-car-loving appetites, the company has released three teaser images of the new car. The above shot shows the 19-inch wheels that come with the M3’s new-for-2011 Competition Package, so expect the special edition to be based on an M3 so equipped. The package also means a 0.4-inch suspension drop plus reprogrammed stability control and electronic damping.

Special-Edition BMW M3 Teased

Also unique is a black-and-red two-tone leather interior, a mix of two colors offered on the standard M3. The shots are all of a coupe, so we’re guessing this is a two-door-only affair. Come back Thursday for the full story and to find out what, if any, other changes BMW has in store.

Special-Edition BMW M3 Teased

2008 Neiman Marcus Special Edition Hennessey Venom 700NM

From the press-releases-we-never-thought-we’d-see file comes the announcement of the 2008 Neiman Marcus Special Edition Hennessey Venom 700NM, a car with a name long enough to pretty much tell the entire story, full as it is of contradiction and detail and excitement about a car that is equal parts white trash and fat-cat aristocrat. What’s next? The Kmart Blue Light Special Phantom drophead coupé?

That’s right. Instead of the usual sassy AMG Benz or M-powered Bimmer, Neiman Marcus thought it would be a good idea to offer a souped-up Dodge Viper in the pages of this year’s men’s catalog, complete with special touches such as jet-black paint, a red-and-black leather-trimmed custom interior, matching fitted luggage (of course!), special badges, and more.

Hennessey’s contribution to this whole mess includes a naturally aspirated version of the Viper’s 8.4-liter V-10 engine tuned to 700 horsepower and 645 pound-feet of torque; upgraded brakes, wheels, and suspension pieces; and an aero kit brazen enough to turn the Viper into a machine capable of offending even more Neiman Marcus customers than the standard Viper can do on its own. Can we mention the heinous rear wing?

If nothing else, it will be fast. Hennessey claims the Venom 700NM coupe can hit 60 in 3.3 seconds on its way to a rather elevated top speed of 214 mph. And we expect that a trunk full of the wife’s makeup and shoes shouldn’t slow it down too much.

Special Edition Hennessey Venom
Special Edition Hennessey Venom
Special Edition Hennessey Venom
Special Edition Hennessey Venom
Special Edition Hennessey Venom
Special Edition Hennessey Venom

 
Copyright @ 2008-2010 Automotive | All About Automotive | Powered by Blogger Theme by Donkrax